Comments on: Jetpack FAQ http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/ -- aza | ɐzɐ -- Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:33:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5 By: شات http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-7015 شات Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:05:50 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-7015 +1 for portable extensions [<a href="http://chat.s3fre.com" rel="nofollow">شات كتابي</a>][<a href="http://www.s3fre.com" rel="nofollow">شات صوتي</a>][<a href="http://www.koutq8.com" rel="nofollow">كوت الكويت</a>] +1 for portable extensions [شات كتابي][شات صوتي][كوت الكويت]

]]> By: buy pro duo 16gb http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-6837 buy pro duo 16gb Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:50:04 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-6837 The graphics are very simple. There are no cutscenes, no bosses, no music, and very few sound effects; it's just straight-up, no-nonsense platforming goodness. The regular game boasts 100 levels, and many of them are undoubtedly among the most challenging platformer levels you will every play. Jetpack is highly replayable due to the ability to play levels out of order, the built-in level editor The graphics are very simple. There are no cutscenes, no bosses, no music, and very few sound effects; it’s just straight-up, no-nonsense platforming goodness. The regular game boasts 100 levels, and many of them are undoubtedly among the most challenging platformer levels you will every play. Jetpack is highly replayable due to the ability to play levels out of order, the built-in level editor

]]> By: شات صوتي http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-6725 شات صوتي Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:46:54 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-6725 I would also study the mechanism that Google Wave employs for deploying extensions. Seems awesome, and at least can give inspiration for the UX of the “installation”. I would also study the mechanism that Google Wave employs for deploying extensions. Seems awesome, and at least can give inspiration for the UX of the “installation”.

]]> By: jean http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-6715 jean Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:59:26 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-6715 <a href="http://www.ugg-sales.net/" rel="nofollow">sale uggs</a> sale uggs

]]> By: دردشه صوتيه http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-6620 دردشه صوتيه Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:51:34 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-6620 +1 for portable extensions +1 for portable extensions

]]> By: شات http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-6541 شات Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:41:30 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-6541 @vere nice@ @vere nice@

]]> By: assapin http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-5457 assapin Mon, 08 Jun 2009 19:00:38 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-5457 +1 for portable extensions I would also study the mechanism that Google Wave employs for deploying extensions. Seems awesome, and at least can give inspiration for the UX of the "installation". +1 for portable extensions

I would also study the mechanism that Google Wave employs for deploying extensions. Seems awesome, and at least can give inspiration for the UX of the “installation”.

]]> By: Benjamin http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-5429 Benjamin Sun, 31 May 2009 08:18:11 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-5429 This looks amazing. I always love reading about the work you guys are doing at Firefox. Especially Ubiquity and JetPack. +1 for browser-neutral extensions! This looks amazing. I always love reading about the work you guys are doing at Firefox. Especially Ubiquity and JetPack.

+1 for browser-neutral extensions!

]]> By: Justin Mason http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-5425 Justin Mason Fri, 29 May 2009 10:06:21 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-5425 Any chance you _could_ ease migration from Greasemonkey to JetPack? as far as I can tell, GM is effectively unmaintained at this stage, going by its recent release history. Each time a new FF 3.5 beta is released, we GM users have to download sketchy third-party rebuilds/repacks of dev builds, which is not a good idea. :( Any chance you _could_ ease migration from Greasemonkey to JetPack? as far as I can tell, GM is effectively unmaintained at this stage, going by its recent release history. Each time a new FF 3.5 beta is released, we GM users have to download sketchy third-party rebuilds/repacks of dev builds, which is not a good idea. :(

]]> By: Dan Cardin http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack-faq/#comment-5422 Dan Cardin Thu, 28 May 2009 20:29:39 +0000 http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=475#comment-5422 Is it just me or is ubiquity being taken apart. With taskFox and jetPack, it seems like you're taking the basic parts of Ubiquity apart and sticking them in other things. Is it just me or is ubiquity being taken apart. With taskFox and jetPack, it seems like you’re taking the basic parts of Ubiquity apart and sticking them in other things.

]]>