<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox Image Editor: 14 Lines of Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/</link>
	<description>-- aza &#124; ɐzɐ --</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: buy 8gb m2</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6824</link>
		<dc:creator>buy 8gb m2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 05:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6824</guid>
		<description>There is no doubt about it and i am using few of the list, thanks for sharing i will other plugin also.I’m surprised you didn’t add the Wordtracker SEO Blogger add-on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no doubt about it and i am using few of the list, thanks for sharing i will other plugin also.I’m surprised you didn’t add the Wordtracker SEO Blogger add-on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hari K T</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6711</link>
		<dc:creator>Hari K T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6711</guid>
		<description>Wow that's awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow that&#8217;s awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippe</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6702</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6702</guid>
		<description>Looks still complicated ;) 
You should add a jetpack method to inject a JS in the page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks still complicated ;)<br />
You should add a jetpack method to inject a JS in the page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: دردشه صوتيه</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6617</link>
		<dc:creator>دردشه صوتيه</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6617</guid>
		<description>woooow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woooow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooring packs</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6462</link>
		<dc:creator>mooring packs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6462</guid>
		<description>WOW. That's really nice editor. I had tried this. Now, my browser runs extremely fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW. That&#8217;s really nice editor. I had tried this. Now, my browser runs extremely fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcin Ignac</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcin Ignac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 23:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6446</guid>
		<description>Hi Aza, what kind of JavaScript construction is:

function(target) ( { ... } )

What are this parenthesis doing after anonymous function declaration, around { } object syntax?

And btw what is the hidden logic behind on("img")?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aza, what kind of JavaScript construction is:</p>
<p>function(target) ( { &#8230; } )</p>
<p>What are this parenthesis doing after anonymous function declaration, around { } object syntax?</p>
<p>And btw what is the hidden logic behind on(&#8221;img&#8221;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aza Raskin</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6445</link>
		<dc:creator>Aza Raskin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6445</guid>
		<description>@Adam: Currently syntax highlighting only works on OS X. In the next release of Jetpack, we should have Bespin working for all platforms.

@lockoom: sep332 has it right. The web is about standing on the shoulders of giants. If you could embed Gecko in one line of code and build something interesting in a couple more, then yes you could claim a minimal-code browser. It's about the end result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adam: Currently syntax highlighting only works on OS X. In the next release of Jetpack, we should have Bespin working for all platforms.</p>
<p>@lockoom: sep332 has it right. The web is about standing on the shoulders of giants. If you could embed Gecko in one line of code and build something interesting in a couple more, then yes you could claim a minimal-code browser. It&#8217;s about the end result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sep332</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6443</link>
		<dc:creator>sep332</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6443</guid>
		<description>This isn't about implementing new features, this is about adding existing features to the browser.  With jetpack, you can stop worrying about where the functionality lives, because it works just like a part of your browser.  Stop complaining about "Flash is doing all the heavy lifting" that's not the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t about implementing new features, this is about adding existing features to the browser.  With jetpack, you can stop worrying about where the functionality lives, because it works just like a part of your browser.  Stop complaining about &#8220;Flash is doing all the heavy lifting&#8221; that&#8217;s not the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lockoom</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6442</link>
		<dc:creator>lockoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6442</guid>
		<description>Well then if I embed Gecko engine in my app could I claim that I wrote entire rendering engine in few lines?

Ok, Jetpack is great but this kind of publicity just sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then if I embed Gecko engine in my app could I claim that I wrote entire rendering engine in few lines?</p>
<p>Ok, Jetpack is great but this kind of publicity just sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/jetpack_image_editor/#comment-6440</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.azarask.in/blog/?p=539#comment-6440</guid>
		<description>Wait.. how did u get syntax highlighting in there?
1. It would be in future builds
2. It is an add-on that integrates (what looks to me like) bespin :)
3. Jetpack already had it from the start and it doesn't work for me :(

By the way this is win 7 with jetpack 1.6.1 and firefox 3.5.5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait.. how did u get syntax highlighting in there?<br />
1. It would be in future builds<br />
2. It is an add-on that integrates (what looks to me like) bespin :)<br />
3. Jetpack already had it from the start and it doesn&#8217;t work for me :(</p>
<p>By the way this is win 7 with jetpack 1.6.1 and firefox 3.5.5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
